Author: Stan Cox

Consider this text: “If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside the family; her husband’s brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel” (Deuteronomy 25:5-6). This duty of the second brother is the basis upon which the Sadducees argued that there is no resurrection in Matthew 22:23-33).

The Sadducees posited a hypothetical example of a widow of all seven brothers, none of which gave her an heir, which “proved” that the very idea of a resurrection was untenable. Consider, very religious people arguing vociferously from ignorance. That is what Jesus, in a decidedly pointed response, told them! “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven” (Matthew 22:29-30). Continue reading “Marriage Duty and the Resurrection” →

The second church Jesus wrote to was the church in Smyrna. The church is known as the persecuted church. This congregation was oppressed. As they sought to be faithful at this time, they were beset by tribulation (cf. James 1:24) and economic oppression. Even so they were rich spiritually!

Jesus comforted them. That comfort was not a promise to deliver them out of trials, but rather a promise to give them an eternal reward because of their faithfulness. “Be faithful until death, and I will give you a crown of life” (10). This end of the Christian’s sojourn on earth is our reason for hope. It is the reason we can live our lives in the midst of our enemies without fear! “What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?” (Romans 8:31) (cf. Matthew 10:28).

Here is our promise, made by the Lord to the church in Smyrna at the end of the first century, “He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death” (11)!

In Paul’s letter to the Philippians, he wrote clearly that our default state as God’s children is joy! We are to rejoice in the Lord. That should remain our condition even when we receive warnings and admonitions such as those Paul shared with the Philippians, “For me to write the same things to you is not tedious, but for you it is safe” (3:1).

One of those admonitions came in the very next verse. “Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the mutilation!” (3:2). It seems obvious that in this case Paul is warning against the Jews, and more specifically against the error of the Judaizers, who felt that the Christian faith could be practiced only as a Jew or Jewish proselyte.

The word “dogs” here is used with derision. The Jew used it that way toward the Gentiles, but here Paul turns the table against them. Dogs were not beloved pets in the first century.  The term was a sharp and negative name when associated with men (cf. Revelation 22:15).

Calling them evil workers, and associating their demand of circumcision to the Gentile with mutilation, completed Paul’s denunciation.

We too must “beware of dogs” today as Christians. Anyone who would disregard God’s will, and seeks to bring such error to other men deserves such a designation!

Visiting Speaker: Tyler Hammock

• Audio
• YouTube Video of Sermon

<<———><><———>>

The concept of Sanctification requires us to be godly and circumspect in our language.

• Audio
• PPTX (Right Click to SAVE)
• YouTube Video of Sermon

<<———><><———>>

Most are familiar with the narrative in 1 Kings of the prophet Elijah and King Ahab. In 1 Kings 17:1 we read, “And Elijah the Tishbite, of the inhabitants of Gilead, said to Ahab, ‘As the Lord God of Israel lives, before whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years, except at my word.” At first glance one might think that Elijah was acting with hubris, making the claim that he could and would control the rain in Israel. This was not so at all.

First, there was a reason Elijah proclaimed this to Ahab. In the previous chapter we read of the ungodliness of this king of Israel. “Now Ahab the son of Omri did evil in the sight of the LORD, more than all who were before him. And it came to pass, as though it had been a trivial thing for him to walk in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, that he took as wife Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal, king of the Sidonians; and he went and served Baal and worshiped him. Then he set up an altar for Baal in the temple of Baal, which he had built in Samaria. And Ahab made a wooden image. Ahab did more to provoke the LORD God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel who were before him” (1 Kings 16:30-33). Continue reading “A True Troubler” →

In his letter to the Romans the apostle Paul spoke of the failure of Israel to repent at the appearance of the Christ. Even so, under that New Covenant, God promised salvation to a remnant. Paul wrote, “Even so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace” (Romans 11:5).

Later in the chapter, Paul turned his attention to the Gentiles. The salvation of the Gentiles was a primary concern of Paul. It was a component of his mission, given by the Lord at his conversion. The preacher Ananias was sent to Paul by the Lord, who told Ananias, “Go, for her is a chosen vessel of Mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel” (Acts 9:15). Continue reading “The Grafted Branches” →

The NKJV of the text refers to “the Antichrist.”  You will note the definite article, and the capital to the word, making it a name rather than a description.  Both are highly suspect.  First, it is generally understood that a definite article (the) is not in the text.  Second, the word antichrist as used here does not have reference to a particular individual, but anyone who is opposed to the Messiah.

In effect, “You heard that opposition and error is coming, it is already here, as there are many teaching error and opposed to the Messiah at this time.”

John shows the division between those who accept the truth regarding the Father and His Son, and those who advocated for a very different concept was present. It was obvious. The departure from the faith indicated that they had left the truth, and were no longer to be considered faithful. It had become obvious that the unity God expected of His was no longer respected by some.

“Finally then, brethren, we urge and exhort in the Lord Jesus that you should abound more and more, just as you received from us how you ought to walk and to please God” (1 Thessalonians 4:1).

The phrase “abound more and more” indicates an excess or overflow. In effect, that Christians, learning what God requires of us, should work to grow and grow in these things to the point that they are immeasurable.  Abound in what? Anything that pleases God!

In the previous chapter Paul exhorted the Thessalonians to “abound in love to one another and to all” (3:12).  After these words in (4:1), he includes as an aspect of pleasing God to be sanctified. This means to have a life that is characterized as righteous or holy.

Specifically, he writes, “that you should abstain from sexual immorality; that each of you should know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor” (3).  Such a call to purity and celibacy outside of marriage (cf. Hebrews 13:4) is mostly ignored in our day but has great importance placed upon it by God.

Any type of sexual activity outside of  marriage between a man and woman is NOT abounding more and more in pleasing God!

God’s call for his people to be pure and holy is one of the most powerful arguments in God’s word for modest dress in the Christian.

• Audio
• PPTX (Right Click to SAVE)
• YouTube Video of Sermon

<<———><><———>>

A discussion of the allegory used by the Apostle Paul in Galatians 4:21-31, using Hagar and Sarah to discuss the two covenants of God.

• Audio
• PPTX (Right Click to SAVE)
• YouTube Video of Sermon

<<———><><———>>

In Acts 8, a eunuch from Ethiopia was traveling a road from Jerusalem back to his home. He was reading from the prophet Isaiah, specifically the beginning of chapter 53 when he met the evangelist Philip. When the eunuch asked Philip, “of whom does the prophet say this, of himself or of some other man?”, Philip correctly answered that the prophecy was about Jesus Christ (Acts 8:34-35).

In truth, there is much said about the Christ in Isaiah’s book of prophecy.  The interesting thing about chapter 53 is that it pictures a Messiah that the Jew of Jesus’ time would have a hard time accepting.  Let’s explain:

“For He shall grow up before Him as a tender plant, and as a root out of dry ground. He has no form or comeliness; and when we see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire Him” (Isaiah 53:2). Continue reading “The Rejected Savior of Mankind” →

“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters” (Genesis 1:1-2). This was the initial state of God’s created universe.  A big question is asked by many — How much time passed between this statement by Moses in Genesis 1:1-2, and the word “Then” which begins the third verse. The answer is, nobody knows. It has not been revealed.

What we do know is that the week of creation described by Moses in verses 3-31 was described by Jesus as being part of the beginning. Jesus said in Matthew 19, “And He answered and said to them, ‘Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female,’” (4). The idea that billions of years passed between verse 2 and verse 3 does not jibe with Jesus’ words. However, a relatively short time, whatever it might be, does no damage to Jesus’ claim that God instituted marriage at the beginning of His creation. Continue reading “In the Beginning” →

Here is the danger of the false teacher. He uses sophistry to allure the elect. We have obeyed the truth and escaped from a life lived in error. But, the false teacher seeks to turn us back to corruption.  That corruption brings slavery to sin. “Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one’s slaves whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness?” (Romans 6:16).

This allurement can bring total apostasy. As the gospel is the sole means of escaping error, another gospel (a perversion, cf. Galatians 1:6-7), if embraced, causes you to reject that sole means of obtaining salvation! (cf. Romans 1:16).

Peter has a sobering truth to share about those who reject the truth they once embraced. “For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them” (21). A careful consideration clearly shows this to be true.

In Titus 2, Paul exhorted the evangelist, “But as for you, speak the things which are proper for sound doctrine.”  This answers the question, “Is doctrine important?” Yes!

But it leads to another question. “What kind of doctrine is sound?” The Greek word translated “sound” (hygiain?) signifies wholeness, wellness (and in the realm of doctrine) uncorruptness. As Thayer put it, “Metaphorically, the phrase is used of one whose Christian opinions are free from any admixture of error.”

Put simply, sound doctrine is teaching that is based solely on God’s word. This is as it has always been, as men have sought to ensure their standing with God. Jesus Himself said, “If you love Me, keep My commandments” (John 14:15).

The scriptures are where we gain access to God’s will. Paul wrote that scripture is inspired of God, and is sufficient for man. It is “profitable for doctrine” and in it alone the “man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

As the Psalmist so wonderfully exclaimed, “How can a young man cleanse his way? By taking heed according to Your word. With my whole heart I have sought You; Oh, let me not wander from Your commandments! Your word I have hidden in my heart, that I might not sin against You” (Psalms 119:9-11).